MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990764530 · doi:10.1145/1291233.1291440

Non-electrophonic cyborg instruments

2007· article· en· W1990764530 on OpenAlexafffund
Steve Mann, Ryan Janzen, Raymond Lo, James Fung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Musicological Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaCanada Council for the Arts
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce a new musical instrument in which computation is used to modify acoustically generated sounds. The acoustically generated sounds originate from real physical objects in the user's environment. These sounds are picked up by one or more microphones connected to a camera phone which filters the sounds using filters whose coefficients change in response to subject matter present in view of the camera. In one example, a row of 12 image processing zones is presented such that sounds originating from real world objects in the first zone are mapped to the first note on a musical scale, sounds originating from the second zone are mapped to the second note of the musical scale, and so on. Thus a user can hit a cement wall or sidewalk, or the ground, and the camera phone will transform the resulting sound (e.g. a dull "thud") into a desired sound, such as the sound of tubular bells, chimes, or the like. Note that the instrument is not an electronic instrument (i.e. not an Electrophone in the Hornbostel Sachs sense) because the sound originates acoustically and is merely filtered toward the desired note. This plays upon the acoustic qualities and physicality of the originating media. For example, if we strike the ground abruptly, the sound resembles that of a bell being hit abruptly. If we rub the ground, the sound resembles that of rubbing a bell. We can scrape the ground in various ways to obtain various sounds that differ depending on which of the camera's zones we're in, as well as the physical properties of the ground itself. These experiences can be shared across "cyborgspace" to effectively blur the boundary between the real and virtual worlds. We present an aquatic instrument that plays upon jets of water, where it is the filter coefficients of the transform that are shared. This allows both users to play the instrument in the jets of water of different public fountains but still experience the same musical qualities of the instrument, and share the physical experience of playing in a fountain despite geographic distances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDiverse Musicological StudiesFrench-language works237,207