MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990801008 · doi:10.1080/07060660609507386

Resistance genes to<i>Leptosphaeria maculans</i>in<i>Brassica napus</i>

2006· article· he· W1990801008 on OpenAlex
S. R. Rimmer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2006
Typearticle
Languagehe
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeptosphaeria maculansCanolaBrassicaCultivarBiologyResistance (ecology)Race (biology)BlacklegPlant disease resistanceArms raceGeneticsGeneAgronomyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Black leg of canola (Brassica napus), caused by Leptosphaeria maculans, is primarily controlled by the use of resistant cultivars. In Canada, resistance has been effective for about 10 years, but the frequency of new pathotypes is increasing and there are reports of breakdown of resistance in some cultivars. Race-nonspecific resistance is present in many cultivars in Australia and Europe. The genetic basis of resistance in Canadian cultivars is unknown. This paper reviews our current knowledge relating to disease management using resistance in Canada and the genetics of race-specific and race-nonspecific resistance in the host-pathogen interaction between L. maculans and B. napus. The particular focus is on resistance associated with the A genome and how resistance might be achieved over the long term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it