MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990824482 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-2879

Abstract 2879: Pre-clinical characterization of Dacomitinib, an irreversible pan-HER inhibitor, combined with radiation therapy in head and neck cancer models

2012· article· en· W1990824482 on OpenAlexaff
Justin Williams, Inki Kim, Shi‐Jun Yue, Wei Shi, Emma Ito, Lillian L. Siu, John Waldron, Fei‐Fei Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCancerRadiation therapyHead and neck cancerCancer researchOncologyLung cancerEGFR inhibitorsClonogenic assayInternal medicineIn vivoPathologyEpidermal growth factor receptorBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Head and neck cancer is the 5th most common cancer worldwide; the majority of cases (>90%) are squamous cell carcinomas (SCCHNs). Despite advances in treatment, the 5-year overall survival rate for SCCHN patients still remains at ∼40-50%, underscoring the need to develop novel therapeutic strategies. EGFR is over-expressed in ∼90% of SCCHN cases, and is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis. Dacomitinib (D), an irreversible pan-HER inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical potential in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, leading us to explore its therapeutic efficacy in SCCHN pre-clinical models, in combination with radiation therapy (RT), a curative modality for HNC management. Methods: The basal expression of EGFR family members was assessed via qRT-PCR in three SCCHN models (FaDu (human hypopharyngeal), UTSCC-8 & -42a (both laryngeal) squamous cancer, and NOE (normal oral epithelial) cell lines. MTS-based cell viability and clonogenic assays were performed with various concentrations of D, both alone and in combination with irradiation (IR). Inhibition of EGFR signalling by D was confirmed via immunoblotting. Cell cycle analysis was performed to assess mode of cytotoxicity. In vivo therapeutic studies were performed using FaDu xenografts in SCID mice; tumors were extracted post-treatment and examined for TUNEL, CD31, Ki67, and pEGFR via IHC. Results: EGFR was over-expressed in all three SCCHN, compared to the NOE cells. PF (50 nM) reduced FaDu cell viability by ∼25%, with an additive interaction being observed when D was combined with 2 Gy IR (∼36%). Similar trends were observed in the other two cell lines and also in the clonogenic assays. Immunoblotting confirmed a dose-dependent inhibition of EGFR signalling in D-treated SCCHN cells, along with downstream reduction of p-Erk, p-Akt, and p-mTOR expression. Cell cycle analyses showed ∼20% increase in the G0/G1 cell population in D-treated FaDu cells, and ∼10% increase in the sub-G cell population when D and IR were combined. Mice treated with the combination of D + IR exhibited a maximum tumor growth delay of ∼21 days, as compared to the IR only group, determined by time to tumor-plus-leg diameter of 14mm. Preliminary histological analysis of the extracted tumor tissue show ∼40% reduction in Ki67 staining in the PF + IR treated mice. The addition of D to IR appeared to be well-tolerated, with no change in body weight, or extent of alopecia. Conclusion: Dacomitinib effectively inhibited EGFR signalling in SCCHN models, leading to a reduction in cell viability and clonogenic survival in vitro, along with tumor growth delay in vivo. When D was combined with IR, there was an additive interaction, both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, D combined with RT may have a therapeutic benefit for patients with SCCHN. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2879. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-2879

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.475
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207