MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990824724 · doi:10.1002/jlcr.1908

Radiosynthesis of [<sup>11</sup>C]SL25.1188 via [<sup>11</sup>C]CO<sub>2</sub> fixation for imaging monoamine oxidase B

2011· article· en· W1990824724 on OpenAlexaff
Neil Vasdev, Oleg Sadovski, Armando García, Frédéric Dollé, Jeffrey H. Meyer, Sylvain Houle, Alan A. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryYield (engineering)RadiosynthesisMonoamine oxidase BRadiochemistrySpecific activityMonoamine oxidaseNuclear chemistryEnantiomerStereochemistryMedicinal chemistryEnzymeNuclear medicineOrganic chemistryPositron emission tomography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon‐11‐labelled (S)‐5‐methoxymethyl‐3‐[6‐(4,4,4‐trifluorobutoxy)benzo[d]isoxazol‐3‐yl]oxazolidin‐2‐[11C]‐one ([11C]SL25.1188), a promising reversibly binding radiotracer for imaging central monoamine oxidase B, was rapidly prepared via an intramolecular cyclization reaction in an automated one‐pot procedure directly from [11C]CO2, thereby precluding the use of [11C]COCl2. Formulated [11C]SL25.1188 was isolated in 12 ± 1% uncorrected radiochemical yield, based on starting [11C]CO2, with a specific activity of 37 ± 2 GBq/µmol at the end of synthesis (30 min; n = 3). Radiochemical and enantiomeric purities were both >99%. The methodology described herein offers an efficient production of [11C]SL25.1188 at ambient temperature and is suitable for human imaging studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Labelled Compounds and RadiopharmaceuticalsSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207