MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990827918 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.41.5.1203

CRYSTAL CHEMISTRY OF THE ROSENBUSCHITE GROUP

2003· article· en· W1990827918 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallographyOctahedronCrystal chemistryPolyhedronValence (chemistry)Group (periodic table)Crystal structureChemistryCrystal (programming language)Solid solutionMaterials scienceGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The minerals of the rosenbuschite group are sorosilicates composed of a framework of 6- to 8-corner polyhedra and rows of Si2O7 dimers. The polyhedra combine into layers (O layers) and into ribbons by edge sharing. Heterogeneous layers (H layers), composed of the octahedra from the ribbons and the sorosilicate groups, alternate with the O layer into a layered HOH structure. The 6- to 8-corner polyhedra host a variety of cations: Na, Mg, Ca, Ti, Mn, Fe, Y, Zr, Nb and the REE. Substitutions among these elements affect the geometrical properties of the various polyhedra. Crystal-structure refinements (X-ray diffraction) have been done on five specimens of the rosenbuschite group: götzenite, hainite, kochite (a new member of the group), rosenbuschite and seidozerite. Detailed models for their site occupancies are derived by fitting scattering values of the sites to the chemical compo-sition, and the weighted bond-valence sums to valence sums in an integrated calculation procedure. Results of chemical analyses suggest a series of intermediate compositions between götzenite and kochite. This series may be described as a solid-solution series in which Zr substitutes for Ca in one structural position, götzenite being the Ca-rich end-member. Through substitution of Ti by Zr, still another solid-solution exists between kochite and rosenbuschite, with rosenbuschite as the Zr-rich member. The Ca → Zr substitution has significant effect on the size of the respective octahedron, as well as on the dimension and distortion of the adjacent polyhedra. The reduction in size of the Ca → Zr octahedron is partly compensated by an enlargement of the dimensions of the adjacent Ti octahedron. This change favors the Ti → Zr substitution at the latter site. Different degrees of distortion in the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it