La3+-catalyzed methanolysis of O,O-diethyl S-(p-nitrophenyl) phosphorothioate and O,O-diethyl S-phenyl phosphorothioate. Millions-fold acceleration of the destruction of V-agent simulants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The La3+-catalyzed methanolysis of two phosphorothioate derivatives, O,O-diethyl S-(p-nitrophenyl) phosphorothioate (4a) and O,O-diethyl S-phenyl phosphorothioate (4b) were studied as a function of [La3+] and pH in methanol solvent. In both cases the kinetics of catalyzed methanolysis maximize at pH 9.1 and a detailed analysis indicates that the dominant species responsible for catalysis are dimers formulated as La3+(2)(-OCH3)2 and La3+(2)(-OCH3)4. The catalysis is compared with that seen for the corresponding phosphate esters, namely paraoxon (3a) and O,O-diethyl phenyl phosphate (3b) for which La3+ catalysis is slightly better and markedly worse than for 4a and 4b respectively. Overall, at s(s)pH 9.1, a 2 mmol dm-3 solution of La(OTf)3 with equimolar NaOCH3 provides accelerations of 2.2x10(8)-fold, 9.7x10(6)-fold and 9.3x10(6)-fold for methanolysis of 3a, 4a and 4b, relative to the background reaction of methoxide reacting with the three substrates. In each case, the P-containing product of the reactions is exclusively diethyl methyl phosphate. Turnover experiments with 6-fold and 100-fold excesses of 4a and 4b respectively, methanolyzed in the presence of approximately 10 mmol dm-3 La3+ and equimolar NaOCH3, indicate that the reactions are essentially complete within 103 s and 70 min respectively. The latter turnover experiment with 4b corresponded to 100 turnovers in 70 min and an overall reaction t1/2 of 8 min. A common mechanism of reaction is postulated for each of the substrates which involves Lewis acid coordination of one of the La3+ to the P=O unit, followed by nucleophilic attack by the second La3+-(-)OCH3.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".