MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W199084624

Acute myocardial ischemia associated with ingestion of bupropion and pseudoephedrine in a 21-year-old man.

2001· article· en· W199084624 on OpenAlexaff
Kaja Pederson, Don Kuntz, G J Garbe

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPoisoning and overdose treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBupropionChest painMyocardial infarctionEmergency departmentPseudoephedrineAcute coronary syndromeCardiologyInternal medicineTroponinCoronary artery diseaseCoronary vasospasmAnesthesiaSmoking cessationAnginaEphedrine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 21-year-old man presented to the emergency department with atypical chest pain, diaphoresis and shortness of breath. His electrocardiogram revealed ST segment elevation in leads II, III, aVF, V5 and V6, elevated creatine kinase-MB subunit levels and positive troponin I. He denied the use of cocaine, and smoking was his only risk factor for coronary artery disease. The patient was diagnosed with an acute myocardial infarction, yet an emergency coronary angiogram revealed normal coronary arteries. His medication history revealed recent commencement of bupropion for smoking cessation and pseudoephedrine as a nonprescription influenza remedy. It was postulated that this patient experienced acute coronary vasospasm in the presence of these two known sympathomimetic agents. The present case is the first report linking bupropion to an acute coronary syndrome, and one of a few cases associated with pseudoephedrine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicPoisoning and overdose treatmentsFrench-language works237,207