MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990860457 · doi:10.1159/000133261

Mechanisms of loss of heterozygosity in retinoblastoma

2008· article· en· W1990860457 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCytogenetics and Cell Genetics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Oncology and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoss of heterozygosityRetinoblastomaBiologyMitotic crossoverGermline mutationSomatic cellCancer researchGermlineChromosomeAlleleGeneticsMutationMitosisMolecular biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Retinoblastoma (RB) tumors arise when both alleles of the RB1 gene are inactivated by two mutational events (M1 and M2). M1 can be an initial germline or somatic mutation; M2 is frequently loss of heterozygosity (LOH), which makes the cell homozygous or hemizygous for the original mutation. LOH is the major mechanism by which many cancers are initiated. To further delineate the mechanism of LOH, we screened a total of 37 RB tumors for LOH by Southern blot analysis. The tumors were from 17 bilaterally and 17 unilaterally affected patients. Nineteen of 30 informative tumors (63%) from 27 patients showed LOH. Proximal and distal flanking markers on chromosome 13 were informative in 13 tumors, allowing evaluation of the mechanisms by which LOH occurred. Mitotic recombination was implicated in 6 (46%) of the 13 tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it