MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990871307 · doi:10.2514/1.j053530

Nonlinear Generalized Lifting-Line Coupling Algorithms for Pre/Poststall Flows

2015· article· en· W1990871307 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegendre polynomialsNonlinear systemAlgorithmInterpolation (computer graphics)Stall (fluid mechanics)MathematicsDissipationFlow (mathematics)Coupling (piping)Applied mathematicsComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Mathematical analysisGeometryMechanicsPhysicsClassical mechanicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerical algorithms and solutions of generalized nonlinear lifting-line theory over an elliptical wing are examined, with emphasis on near/poststall flows. First, a thorough analysis on the circulation-based and angle-of-attack-based correction methods ( and methods, respectively) highlights their respective numerical poststall characteristics. The stability of the method is demonstrated, producing single and multiple solutions in the pre- and poststall regions, respectively. Second, artificial dissipation added to the method is shown to be an effective means of controlling the poststall flow region. Finally, a strongly coupled algorithm is presented, allowing to bypass the interpolation phase via the use of Legendre polynomials. The model sheds light on poststall flow behavior, in agreement with several papers studying formation of stall cell patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it