MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990876397 · doi:10.1109/spacomm.2010.8

Ka-Band Multi-port Power Amplifier Calibration Experiment and Results

2010· article· en· W1990876397 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplifierCalibrationPort (circuit theory)Interference (communication)Electronic engineeringComputer sciencePower (physics)SIGNAL (programming language)EngineeringTelecommunicationsCMOSPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multi-port power amplifier (MPA) is a multi-input multi-output system that is capable of amplifying multiple input signals simultaneously by a set of shared power amplifiers without mutual interference. In a practical MPA, the component imperfections reduce the port isolation, which introduces leakage or cross-port interference. A patent-pending type-based calibration technique is studied in this paper. It exploits the uniqueness of the statistics for a given communication signal to estimate a calibration matrix that minimizes the effects of the MPA impairments and suppresses the cross-port interference. Experimentation with a 4-port 20 GHz prototype MPA subsystem is conducted to evaluate the type-based calibration technique. Results show that it can accurately estimate the calibration matrix to improve the MPA performance significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207