Light trapping in nanotube-based dye-sensitized solar cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe a design for a photonic crystal dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) that can attain at least a factor of one-third enhancement in solar light absorption relative to a conventional cell. The design consists of a periodic array of modulated-diameter TiO<sub>2</sub> nanotubes filled with TiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles and interstitial regions filled with electrolyte. Using nanotubes filled with nanoparticles provides not only light trapping and absorption enhancement, but offers improved electrical transport through the nanotube walls. Keeping the volume of dye-coated TiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles in the cell constant, our design gives a maximum achievable photocurrent density (MAPD) of over 21mA/cm<sup>2</sup> in 2D simulations, well beyond the current record for C101-based cells. The design is shown to be feasible using current manufacturing techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".