The effects of stage configurations in a recital hall
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The room acoustical parameters, the reverberation time (RT), the early decay time (EDT), the bass ratio (BR), the clarity factor (C80), the initial time delay gap (ITDG), and the interaural cross-correlation coefficient (IACC) were measured for acoustical evaluation both in the audience seats and on the stage, using six different stage configurations in a 450-seat unoccupied hall. The stage configurations consisted of combinations of varying the position of the drapes with and without the reflector at the back of the stage. The listening test was conducted in a laboratory using high fidelity headphones to verify the subjective preference for the seats and the presence of the reflector. Analysis showed that the draped area of the stage was related to the RT, EDT, C80, BR, while the ITDG was strongly dependent on the presence of the reflector. There was not a strong impact observed in the IACC for the varying configurations. In general, the reflectors improved most of the acoustical parameters. The loudness of the musical sound was the primary parameter used to decide the subjective preference, which correlated with the C80 and the ITDG with the reflector.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".