Estimation of genetic parameters for canine hip dysplasia in the Swiss Newfoundland population
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Variance components and genetic parameters for hip dysplasia (HD) in a population of 1372 Newfoundlands were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood method applied to animal models comprising fixed effects of gender, screening expert and HD grading system. All models investigated included a random direct genetic effect, but differed for combinations of random maternal genetic effect, permanent maternal environmental effect and kennel effect. Although kennels had no effect on HD, the permanent maternal environmental effects, however were significant. The results for the maternal genetic effect were ambiguous. These results suggest a confounding of these three random effects. The model that included the fixed effects, the direct genetic effect and the permanent maternal environmental effect was the most parsimonious combined with an optimal fit. The heritability estimated with this model was 0.28 and the proportion of the permanent maternal environmental effect of the phenotypic variance was 0.10. The effects of gender and screening expert were significant but not the one of HD grading system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it