MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990963188 · doi:10.1063/1.1337804

Gas-phase nuclear magnetic relaxation in Xe129 revisited

2001· article· en· W1990963188 on OpenAlexaff
Igor Moudrakovski, Steven R. Breeze, Benoît Simard, C. I. Ratcliffe, John A. Ripmeester, Tamar Seideman, J. S. Tse, Giles Santyr

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversitySteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsRelaxation (psychology)Magnetic fieldChemistrySpin–lattice relaxationField dependenceField (mathematics)Spin–spin relaxationNuclear magnetic resonancePhysicsParamagnetism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this contribution gas-phase Xe129 spin-lattice relaxation time measurements are extended to conditions (pressure, temperature, magnetic-field strength, isotope composition) not previously used. It is shown that wall effects become apparent at densities below ∼20 amagat, and that these become dominant below ∼3 amagat. A significant new discovery from field-dependent studies is that, in addition to the previously identified field-independent spin–rotation relaxation operative in the bulk gas, there is a contribution from the modulation of the chemical shift that depends on the square of the applied magnetic-field strength. The weak temperature dependence of the relaxation times can be understood in terms of the opposite temperature coefficients of the field-independent and field-dependent contributions to the relaxation. The spin–rotation contribution and its temperature dependence are calculated and found to be in good agreement with the experimental data. The low field, low density limit for the relaxation time is 56.3±2.6 hr⋅amagat at 295 K in the absence of wall effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207