MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990974813 · doi:10.1016/s0840-4704(10)60077-4

Passing the Baton — Toward Making a Case for a Canadian Centre for Health Leadership

2006· article· en· W1990974813 on OpenAlexaffabout
William G. Tholl, Monika MacLaren, Alexandra Tcheremenska-Greenhill, Owen Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Management Forum · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOrganizational Learning and Leadership
Canadian institutionsHeart and Stroke FoundationCanadian Medical Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrivate sectorPublic relationsPolitical sciencePublic healthHealth carePublic administrationNursingMedicineLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper demonstrates that the average tenure of current senior leaders in the health sector has declined sharply over the last three decades, and is substantially shorter than that of leaders in the private and public arenas. It offers potential reasons for this downward trend, and sets out the broad parameters for a Canadian Centre for Health Leadership, which could help better identify, develop, support, and celebrate leadership in health and healthcare in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0530.023
Scholarly communication0.0170.008
Open science0.0040.010
Research integrity0.0150.026
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare Management ForumSame topicOrganizational Learning and LeadershipFrench-language works237,207