Subvoxel precise skeletons of volumetric data based on fast marching methods
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The accurate calculation of the skeleton of an object is a problem not satisfactorily solved by existing approaches. Most algorithms require a significant amount of user interaction and use a voxel grid to compute discrete and often coarse approximations of this representation of the data. We present a novel, automatic algorithm for computing subvoxel precise skeletons of volumetric data based on subvoxel precise distance fields. Most voxel based centerline and skeleton algorithms start with a binary mask and end with a list of voxels that define the centerline or skeleton. Even though subsequent smoothing may be applied, the results are inherently discrete. Our skeletonization algorithm uses as input a subvoxel precise distance field and employs a number of fast marching method propagations to extract the skeleton at subvoxel precision. We present the skeletons of various three-dimensional (3D) data sets and digital phantom models as validations of our algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it