Leukocyte elastase induces epithelial apoptosis: role of mitochondial permeability changes and Akt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During acute inflammation, neutrophil-mediated injury to epithelium may lead to disruption of epithelial function, including the induction of epithelial apoptosis. Herein, we report the effects of neutrophil transmigration and of purified leukocyte elastase on epithelial cell survival. Neutrophil transmigration induced apoptosis of epithelial cells [control monolayers: 5 +/- 1 cells/25 high-power fields (HPF) vs. neutrophil-treated monolayers: 29 +/- 10 cells/HPF, P < 0.05, n = 3 as determined by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling assay] as did low concentrations (0.1 U/ml) of purified leukocyte elastase (control monolayers: 6.4 +/- 2.5% apoptotic vs. elastase: 26.2 +/- 2.9% apoptotic, P < 0.05, as determined by cytokeratin 18 cleavage). Treatment with elastase resulted in decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, release of cytochrome c to the cytosol, and cleavage of caspases-9 and -3 as determined by Western blot analysis, implicating altered mitochondrial membrane permeability as a primary mechanism for elastase-induced apoptosis. Additionally, incubation of epithelial cells with leukocyte elastase resulted in an early increase followed by a decrease in the phosphorylation of epithelial Akt, a serine/threonine kinase important in cell survival. Inhibition of epithelial Akt before elastase treatment potentiated epithelial cell apoptosis, suggesting that the initial activation of Akt represents a protective response by the epithelial cells to the proapoptotic effects of leukocyte elastase. Taken together, these observations suggest that epithelial cells exhibit a dual response to cellular stress imposed by leukocyte elastase with a proapoptotic response mediated via early alterations in mitochondrial membrane permeability countered by activation of the survival pathway involving Akt.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".