Development of a Fluorescent Ligand-Binding Assay Using the AcroWell Filter Plate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the most powerful tools for receptor research and drug discovery is the use of receptor-ligand affinity screening of combinatorial libraries. Early work involved the use of radioactive ligands to identify a binding event; however, there are numerous limitations involved in the use of radioactivity for high throughput screening. These limitations have led to the creation of highly sensitive, nonradioactive alternatives to investigate receptor-ligand interactions. Pall Gelman Laboratory has introduced the AcroWell, a patented low-fluorescent-background membrane and sealing process together with a filter plate design that is compatible with robotic systems. Taken together, these allow the AcroWell 96-well filter plate to detect trace quantities of lanthanide-labeled ligands for cell-, bead-, or membrane-based assays using time-resolved fluorescence. Using europium-labeled galanin, we have demonstrated that saturation binding experiments can be performed with low-background fluorescence and signal-to-noise ratios that rival traditional radioisotopic techniques while maintaining biological integrity of the receptor-ligand interaction. In addition, the ability to discriminate between active and inactive compounds in a mock galanin screen is demonstrated with low well-to-well variability, allowing reliable determination of positive hits even for low-affinity interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".