MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transmission of a follicular lymphoma by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation – evidence to support the existence of lymphoma progenitor cells

2006· letter· en· W1991218989 on OpenAlexaff
Jason Hart, A. Robert Turner, Loree Larratt, James A. Russell, Bevin Franko, Christine Frantz, Teresa Paonessa, Adnan Mansoor, Raymond Lai

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Haematology · 2006
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral-associated cancers and disorders
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFollicular lymphomaLymphomaBone marrowTransplantationCyclophosphamideLymph node biopsyChemotherapyPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The existence of neoplastic stem cells for haematological malignancies has been postulated (Kuppers et al, 1999), although evidence to support this concept is relatively lacking. We report a case of transmission of follicular lymphoma (FL) in the setting of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) between a father (donor) and his son (recipient). We believe that the findings from this case study provide support to the existence of lymphoma progenitor cells. A 32-year-old man was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia in 1992, for which he received allogeneic bone marrow stem cells from his father. The stem cells were collected by bone marrow harvest, and given directly with no cryopreservation or T-cell depletion, after conditioning with busulfan and cyclophosphamide. The donor and recipient had five out of six identical human leucocyte antigens. The patient's post-transplant clinical course was uncomplicated and immunosuppression was completely removed 1 year after BMT. He has remained in remission from his acute leukaemia since transplantation. In 1995, the patient's father was diagnosed with FL, stage IV; no treatment was given as he was asymptomatic. Eighteen months later, he developed bulky lymphadenopathy. He was given chlorambucil without significant response. Another lymph node biopsy revealed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. He died of the disease in 1998 despite combination chemotherapy. In 2003, the patient developed bulky retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. A biopsy revealed FL with large cell transformation that was Epstein–Barr virus-negative. He was treated with eight cycles of chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy administered to residual retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. Despite an initial clinical response, his disease has slowly progressed since 2003. To examine the biological relationship of the two lymphomas, we performed human identity testing using the human identifier kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The results showed that the recipient's lymphoma was donor cell-derived. BCL2/IGH was then amplified as described (Limpens et al, 1995). Analysis of the BCL2/IGH from both lymphomas revealed an identical fusion site (Fig 1). We analysed the monoclonal IGH species in both tumours using a method previously published (Timms et al, 2003). All five IGH subclones derived from the donor's lymphoma revealed VH3-74 with 97% homology, whereas those from the recipient's lymphoma were VH1-69 with 97–98% homology. Thus, both tumours had features of postgerminal centre cells. Analysis of the sequence of the BCL2/IGH fusion gene that was present in the recipient and donor lymphomas. Findings from our case study are analogous to those of another reported case, in which both the donor and recipient developed peripheral T-cell lymphoma after BMT at 3 and 5 years respectively (Berg et al, 2001). The finding of the identical T-cell receptor gene rearrangement supports that the two lymphomas were derived from the same progenitors. Our finding of the identical BCL2/IGH fusion in both FL leads to the same notion. The possibility that the recipient FL was derived from the rare circulating lymphoma cells from the donor is considered unlikely due to: (i) the lack of evidence of lymphoma in the donor at the time of transplantation; (ii) the long latency (i.e. 11 years) for the lymphoma to develop in the recipient; and (iii) the use of different IGH variable regions in the two tumours. One other possibility is that the recipient's lymphoma was derived from the donor's non-neoplastic, peripheral B-cells that carry the t(14;18) abnormality. This translocation is detectable in 40–50% normal individuals (Limpens et al, 1995). We consider this unlikely, as mature B-cells generally lack regenerative ability. Thus, we believe that the two lymphomas were most probably derived from the same neoplastic progenitors that were transmitted during the transplant, and the findings of this case study support the existence of lymphoma progenitor cells. The concept that B-cell lymphomas develop from lymphoma progenitor cells has been previously postulated. Molecular analysis of rare cases of bigenotypic and biphenotypic, t(14;18)-positive lymphomas showed that two distinct neoplastic B-cell clones may be derived from a single progenitor cell (Cleary et al, 1988). Another study of a composite lymphoma also revealed a common genetic abnormality that was found in three different lymphomatous components (van de Berg et al, 2002). The presence of a dormant lymphoma progenitor cell may explain why FL, a highly chemosensitive disease, remains incurable. Further studies to isolate and characterise these lymphoma progenitors will help better understand the biology of FL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of HaematologySame topicViral-associated cancers and disordersFrench-language works237,207