MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991222875 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2010.5625982

Intelligent Clinical Decision Support Systems based on SNOMED CT

2010· article· en· W1991222875 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBig Data Technologies and Applications
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSNOMED CTComputer scienceDecision support systemClinical decision support systemSystematized Nomenclature of MedicineArtificial intelligenceData miningIntelligent decision support systemProcess (computing)Information retrievalTerminology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The decision support systems that have been developed to assist physicians in the diagnostic process often are based on static data which may be out of date. We present a comprehensive analysis of artificial intelligent methods which could be applied to documents encoded by SNOMED CT. By mining information directly from SNOMED CT encoded documents, a decision support system could contain timely updated diagnostic information, which is of significant value in fast changing situations such as minimally understood emerging diseases and epidemics. Through a high level comparison of many AI methods it is found that a TAN-Bayesian method could be the most suitable to apply to SNOMED CT data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.328
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBig Data Technologies and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207