Molecular Motions in Metal-Containing Polymers: Solid-State Deuterium NMR Studies of Polyferrocenylsilanes near Their Glass Transition Temperature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The molecular motions in polyferrocenylsilanes, a novel class of metal-containing polymers with a main chain of alternating ferrocene and organosilane units, have been probed using variable temperature solid-state 2 H NMR. Polyferrocenylsilanes with selective deuteration of either the cyclopentadienyl ligands of the ferrocene units or the side groups attached to silicon were prepared by ring-opening polymerization methodologies. The polymer backbone motions in the ferrocene-deuterated materials, poly(ferrocenyl- d 8 -dimethylsilane) [Fe(η-C 5 D 4 ) 2 Si(CH 3 ) 2 ] n ( 2a, T g = 33 °C), poly(ferrocenyl- d 8 -dimethoxysilane) [Fe(η-C 5 D 4 ) 2 Si(OCH 3 ) 2 ] n ( 2b, T g = 19 °C), and poly(ferrocenyl- d 8 -dihexyloxysilane) [Fe(η-C 5 D 4 ) 2 Si(OC 6 H 13 ) 2 ] n ( 2c, T g = −51 °C) were examined over a temperature range of −50 to +125 °C. The 2 H NMR spectra of all three polymers indicated that the cyclopentadienyl groups were static at temperatures below the particular mechanical T g . At temperatures just above T g the cyclopentadienyl rings began to undergo slow small-angle oscillations. These motions increased in both rate and angle of excursion until, at a temperature approximately 50−70 °C above the particular mechanical T g, the polymers underwent a transition to a regime characterized by rapid isotropic motional averaging. The silicon side group motions were also examined over the same temperature range using the corresponding poly(ferrocenyldimethyl- d 3 -silane) [Fe(η-C 5 H 4 ) 2 Si(CH 3 )(CD 3 )] n ( 2d, T g = 33 °C) and poly(ferrocenyldimethoxy- d 6 -silane) [Fe(η-C 5 H 4 ) 2 Si(OCD 3 ) 2 ] n ( 2e, T g = 19 °C). For polymer 2d the 2 H NMR spectra showed the presence of fast methyl rotation about the Si−CD 3 bond even at temperatures below the mechanical T g . For polymer 2e, the 2 H NMR spectra showed the presence of fast methyl rotations about the O−CD 3 bond combined with a discrete jumping motion about the Si−O bond. Increasing temperature brought about spectral changes reflecting a superposition of backbone and side-chain motions. At temperatures 50−70 °C above the respective mechanical T g the 2 H NMR spectra of both 2d and 2e were isotropically narrowed, reflecting the onset of isotropic motions of the polymer backbone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".