MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991234588 · doi:10.1115/dscc2010-4039

Tracking Control of Flexible Ball Screw Drives With Runout Effect Compensation

2010· article· en· W1991234588 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBall screwControl theory (sociology)Ball (mathematics)MachiningMachine toolTracking errorComputer scienceControl engineeringTracking (education)EngineeringMechanical engineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most machine tools rely on precision ball screw drives to accurately position the workpiece relative to the tool. In terms of the performance of such machines, tracking is one of the most important aspects that significantly affects the machining outcomes. Minimizing tracking errors of a flexible ball screw drive in the presence of runout phenomenon is explained in this paper. To achieve small tracking errors, the flexibility and runout are modeled by a linear parameter varying system. Based on the derived model, gain scheduling tracking controllers with parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions are designed. The efficiency of the designed controllers in minimizing the tracking error, as well as the importance of the runout modeling, is demonstrated on a ball screw drive experimental setup.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207