MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991244453 · doi:10.1108/13683041211230294

Performance measurement of reverse logistics enterprise: a comprehensive and integrated approach

2012· article· en· W1991244453 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed N. Shaik, Walid Abdul‐Kader

Bibliographic record

VenueMeasuring Business Excellence · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSustainable Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalanced scorecardAnalytic hierarchy processPerformance measurementProcess managementComputer scienceBenchmark (surveying)Relevance (law)Strategy mapPerformance managementProcess (computing)Knowledge managementBusinessOperations researchEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Reverse logistics (RL) has gained considerable attention in the literature. The first objective of this study is to develop a comprehensive performance measurement (PM) framework and scorecard for RL enterprise. The second objective is to integrate analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach for RL PM. Design/methodology/approach The present work presents understanding RL performance and proposes a conceptual comprehensive reverse logistics PM framework and scorecard for managing RL enterprise. The framework developed in the paper is based on an extensive review of literature on RL, PM frameworks such as Balanced Scorecard and performance prism. It is further supported by AHP for calculation of overall comprehensive performance index (OCPI). Findings The scorecard consists of six performance perspectives, as well as key performance measures. The relevance of these perspectives, especially from the reverse logistics viewpoint, has been authenticated. With respect to each perspective, measures have been proposed that efficiently and effectively address the vital facets of an enterprise's business excellence. The paper further proposes a method to prioritize the different performance levels using AHP methodology. It also suggests an OCPI of the enterprise reflecting its relative position and benchmark in the industry sector. Practical implications This study provides a comprehensive PM system and scorecard for measuring and managing RL performance. The integrated AHP methodology developed provides useful guidance for practical managers in evaluation and measuring of RL in a complete and holistic way. Originality/value This paper proposes a comprehensive PM system and scorecard for RL. While suggesting scorecard, different performance measures have been assigned into six different perspectives. The OCPI has been calculated and prioritized performance measures are determined to focus on for continuous improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0110.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeasuring Business ExcellenceSame topicSustainable Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207