MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991254216 · doi:10.1117/12.2017587

Second order optical nonlinear processes as tools to probe anomalies inside high confinement microcavities

2013· article· en· W1991254216 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Collette, Normand Beaudoin, Serge Gauvin

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSecond-harmonic generationNonlinear systemDegenerate energy levelsParametric statisticsAnomaly (physics)Quantum fluctuationField (mathematics)Nonlinear opticsOpticsQuantumCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interest toward strong electromagnetic confinement structures through the use of microcavities is of great interest, from both the fundamental understanding and the technological application sides. Here, we focus our attention to second order nonlinear processes inside such structures. From a basic point of view, electromagnetic confinement leads, physically, to the manipulation of vacuum field fluctuations and, formally, to an anomalous commutation relation [Ueda, M. and Imoto, N., "Anomalous commutation relation and modified spontanenous emission inside a microcavity," Phys. Rev. A, 50(1), 89-92 (1994)]. However, an attempt to probe the resulting anomaly with a beam splitter located inside a cavity is theoretically proved inadequate for this task. For this reason, parametric fluorescence (PF, parametric down conversion) and second harmonic generation (SHG) are considered as potential tools to probe vacuum field fluctuations in confinement structures. Indeed, it was recently showed that PF can be strongly intensified, by two orders of magnitude or more, when it occurs inside a high confinement (open) cavity. Therefore, PF could efficiently be used to probe the expected anomaly. Additionally, in consideration of the simplest possible experimental scheme to probe the anomaly and because it is generally admitted that SHG is the time reversal of degenerate parametric fluorescence, here our attention is also directed toward SHG. Formally, we show that the equations describing SHG and PF are not symmetrical regarding quantum noise. It turns out that, conversely to the case of PF, the intensification of vacuum field fluctuations tends to inhibit SHG. We interpret this result as due to the reduction of waves coherence induced by stronger quantum noise. In conclusion, albeit both processes could be used as probes to prove or disprove the realm of quantum anomalies, PF appears as a more convenient tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207