MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991258367 · doi:10.1021/cm000610y

Mechanism of Reaction and Photoacid Generation of 1,2-di(Arylsulfonyl)hydrazine PAGs:  A Laser Flash Photolytic Study

2001· article· en· W1991258367 on OpenAlexaff
C. Coenjarts, F. Ortica, J. Cameron, Gerd Pohlers, Anthony Zampini, Denis Désilets, H. Liu, J. C. Scaiano

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadical Photochemical Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPhotochemistryFlash photolysisRadicalHomolysisQuantum yieldHydrazine (antidepressant)Bond cleavageYield (engineering)FluorescenceOrganic chemistryReaction rate constantKineticsCatalysisMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The photochemical behavior of four 1,2-di(arylsulfonyl)hydrazine photoacid generators has been studied by means of nanosecond laser flash photolysis (λ = 266 nm) and steady-state photolysis (λ = 254 nm) with the aim of understanding the reactions involved in photoacid generation. Upon photoexcitation, homolytic cleavage of the S−N bond results in the formation of arylsulfonyl radicals. The nitrogen-centered radical that also results from this cleavage decomposes to yield another arylsulfonyl radical. The arylsulfonyl radical generates acid via reaction with oxygen to yield a peroxysulfonyl radical, which subsequently reacts with a hydrogen donor to yield a peroxysulfonic acid. The sulfonic acids detected in product studies are presumed to be the stable decomposition products of these peroxysulfonic acids. Desulfonylation of the arylsulfonyl radical to generate SO 2 is a very minor pathway that occurs in competition with acid generation. Photoacid generation quantum yields upon laser excitation were found to range from 0.05 to 0.1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicRadical Photochemical ReactionsFrench-language works237,207