MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991272020 · doi:10.1029/2011ja017128

In situ observations of the “preexisting auroral arc” by THEMIS all sky imagers and the FAST spacecraft

2012· article· en· W1991272020 on OpenAlexaff
Feifei Jiang, R. J. Strangeway, M. G. Kivelson, J. M. Weygand, R. J. Walker, K. K. Khurana, Y. Nishimura, V. Angelopoulos, E. Donovan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubstormIonosphereGeophysicsPhysicsMagnetometerSpacecraftElectrojetPlasma sheetElectron precipitationEquatorAltitude (triangle)Earth's magnetic fieldMagnetic fieldMagnetosphereGeologyAstrophysicsAstronomyLatitude

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Auroral substorms were first described more than 40 years ago, and their atmospheric and magnetospheric signatures have been investigated extensively. However, because magnetic mapping from the ionosphere to the equator is uncertain especially during active times, the magnetospheric source regions of the substorm‐associated features in the upper atmosphere remain poorly understood. In optical images, auroral substorms always involve brightening followed by poleward expansion of a discrete auroral arc. The arc that brightens is usually the most equatorward of several auroral arcs that remain quiescent for ∼30 min or more before the break‐up commences. In order to identify the magnetospheric region that is magnetically conjugate to this preexisting arc, we combine auroral images from ground‐based imagers, magnetic field and particle data from low‐altitude spacecraft, and maps of field‐aligned currents based on ground magnetometer arrays. We surveyed data from the THEMIS all sky imager (ASI) array and the FAST spacecraft from 2007 to April 2009 and obtained 5 events in which the low altitude FAST spacecraft crossed magnetic flux tubes linked to a preexisting auroral arc imaged by THEMIS ASI prior to substorm onset. The observations show that, in each of the five cases: 1) the precipitating electrons associated with the preexisting arc are accelerated by a field‐aligned potential drop, with characteristic energy ranging from a few hundred eV to a few keV. 2) The preexisting arc is located 1°∼2° poleward of the equatorward edge of the 1 keV electron plasma sheet in the ionosphere, and it maps to equatorial locations within the electron plasma sheet and tailward of its inner edge. 3) The preexisting arc is located at or very near the boundary between the Region 1 and Region 2 field‐aligned currents. The localization relative to the Region 1/Region 2 current is confirmed by comparison with maps of field‐aligned currents inferred from ground magnetometer data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207