Les dissolutions d'union dans les familles recomposées: l'expérience des femmes canadiennes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des travaux récents révèlent la progression et la diversification croissante des familles recomposées au Canada et leur instabilité de plus en plus marquée. Grâce à l'analyse des transitions, on peut estimer les effets de diverses caractéristiques sur la durée de vie conjugale dans ce type de famille, et mettre ainsi en évidence la fragilité accrue des recompositions familiales survenues depuis les années soixante-dix et l'instabilité plus grande des couples unis par union libre plutôt que par mariage. On découvre à l'inverse que la présence d'enfants d'âge préscolaire au moment de la formation de l'unité familiale et l'arrivée d'un enfant issu du couple réduiraient les risques d'éclatement des familles; le type de recomposition familiale exercerait également un effet sur la durée des unions, celles qui comprennent un père gardien et sa nouvelle conjointe étant nettement plus stables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".