A Variant of L<sup>♮</sup>-Convexity and its Application to Inventory Models with Batch Ordering
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies show that the concept of L ♮ -convexity is helpful in characterizing the optimal policy for some inventory models with positive leadtimes. Such examples include the lost-sales inventory model by Zipkin (2008). On the structure of lost-sales inventory models. Operations Research, 56(4) 937–944. and the inventory-pricing model by Pang et al. (2012). A note on the structure of joint inventory-pricing control with leadtimes. Operations Research, 60(3), 581–587. However, when taking batch ordering into account, L ♮ -convexity does not work anymore. In this paper, we extend L ♮ -convexity to a more general concept termed as Q-jump-L ♮ -convexity and apply it to batch ordering inventory models including a lost-sales inventory model and an inventory-pricing model with batch ordering and positive leadtimes. By utilizing this new concept, we can partially characterize the structure of the optimal policies for both the models. Moreover, we are able to evaluate the sensitivity of the optimal decisions with respect to system states. Our results can also be applied to the serial and the assembly inventory systems with lost-sales and batch ordering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it