Chronic Platelet and Neutrophil Adhesion: A Causal Role for Neointimal Hyperplasia in In-Stent Restenosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between platelets and neutrophils and the progression of neointimal hyperplasia after angioplasty versus stenting of porcine coronary arteries. METHODS: Balloon angioplasty or implantation of a balloon-expandable stent was randomly performed in the left and right coronary arteries of 16 Yorkshire swine; the animals were euthanized 1 hour (n=6), 24 hours (n=4), or 1 month (n=6) after the interventions. The adhesion of chromium 51-labeled platelets and indium 111-labeled neutrophils was quantified (per cm2), and histological and morphometric analyses were performed. RESULTS: The acute adhesion of platelets and neutrophils observed on the injured segments 1 hour after the interventions was similar between the treated groups. However, at 24 hours, stenting was associated with 2-fold more platelets and 3-fold more neutrophils (p<0.05) than was dilation, and stented arteries remained more thrombogenic at 1 month (p<0.05). Neointimal formation was more intense after stent implantation (3.80+/-0.77 mm, p<0.05) than after dilation (0.81+/-0.21 mm), and it correlated positively with the adhesion of platelets (r=0.81, p<0.002) and neutrophils (r=0.69, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that stent implantation is associated with a more intense acute and chronic, low-grade inflammatory response than is dilation. It appears that the chronic inflammatory response is, at least in part, platelet- and neutrophil-driven and contributes to the progression of neointimal proliferation after stenting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".