Syncytiotrophoblast Is a Barrier to Maternal-Fetal Transmission of Herpes Simplex Virus1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 has been discovered in placental tissue from spontaneous miscarriages, but reports of transplacental transmission and fetal infection are extremely rare. Previously, we demonstrated that the villous syncytiotrophoblast, which forms a continuous layer between the maternal and fetal circulation, is resistant to HSV entry. Here, we tested our hypothesis that the villous syncytiotrophoblast prevents transplacental transmission of HSV secondary to decreased expression of HSV entry mediators (HveA, HveB, and HveC). In addition, we investigated the ability of HSV to infect extravillous trophoblast cells, which mediate placental attachment to the uterine wall, and the expression of HSV receptors in these cells. We performed fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analyses and immunostaining to demonstrate that HveA, HveB, and HveC were not expressed in third-trimester villous trophoblast cells. Consequently, villous explants obtained from third-trimester placentas were resistant to infection by a recombinant HSV-1 vector, HSV-1 KOS, but approximately 20% of mesenchymal cells within the villous core were infected when villous explants were pretreated with trypsin to disrupt the villous trophoblast layer. Conversely, FACS analysis and immunostaining demonstrated that extravillous trophoblast cells expressed HveA, HveB, and HveC, and these cells were efficiently infected by HSV vectors. Infection of extravillous trophoblast cells by HSV-1 was not reduced when the cells were pretreated with an antibody against HveA but was partially reduced when the cells were pretreated with antibodies directed against HveB and HveC. Thus, the decreased expression of herpesvirus entry mediators in villous syncytiotrophoblast prevents placental villous infection, thereby limiting maternal-fetal transmission of HSV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".