MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991373546 · doi:10.1002/jgt.20570

Self‐dual and self‐petrie‐dual regular maps

2011· article· en· W1991373546 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Graph Theory · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFinite Group Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsVertex (graph theory)Dual (grammatical number)Degree (music)GraphAutomorphismDual graphGenerator (circuit theory)Discrete mathematicsPlanar graphPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Regular maps are cellular decompositions of surfaces with the “highest level of symmetry”, not necessarily orientation‐preserving. Such maps can be identified with three‐generator presentations of groups G of the form G = 〈 a, b, c | a 2 = b 2 = c 2 = ( ab ) k = ( bc ) m = ( ca ) 2 = … = 1〉; the positive integers k and m are the face length and the vertex degree of the map. A regular map ( G ; a, b, c ) is self‐dual if the assignment b ↦ b, c ↦ a and a ↦ c extends to an automorphism of G , and self‐Petrie‐dual if G admits an automorphism fixing b and c and interchanging a with ca . In this note we show that for infinitely many numbers k there exist finite, self‐dual and self‐Petrie‐dual regular maps of vertex degree and face length equal to k . We also prove that no such map with odd vertex degree is a normal Cayley map. Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 69:152‐159, 2012

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it