MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991405149 · doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-00-01246-1

A polynomial-time complexity bound for the computation of the singular part of a Puiseux expansion of an algebraic function

2000· article· en· W1991405149 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics of Computation · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsAlgebraic functionAlgebraic numberRational functionFunction field of an algebraic varietyPolynomialLogarithmNewton polygonFunction (biology)Real algebraic geometryField (mathematics)Algebraic surfaceSingular point of an algebraic varietyAlgebraic extensionPower seriesAlgebraic elementUpper and lower boundsPure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we present a refined version of the Newton polygon process to compute the Puiseux expansions of an algebraic function defined over the rational function field. We determine an upper bound for the bit-complexity of computing the singular part of a Puiseux expansion by this algorithm, and use a recent quantitative version of Eisenstein’s theorem on power series expansions of algebraic functions to show that this computational complexity is polynomial in the degrees and the logarithm of the height of the polynomial defining the algebraic function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it