MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pneumonia During Pregnancy

2007· article· en· W1991416704 on OpenAlexaffabout
M. Reza Shariatzadeh, Thomas J. Marrie

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePneumoniaIncidence (geometry)PregnancyPleural effusionObstetricsProspective cohort studyMaternal deathPediatricsInternal medicinePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pneumonia reportedly increases the risk of maternal and fetal illness and death, and in the United States is a significant cause of nonobstetrical maternal death. Maternal mortality has fallen dramatically since the advent of antibiotics. This prospective study enrolled 28 women who developed pneumonia while pregnant, and presented with signs and symptoms thereof, as well as an acute pulmonary infiltrate, to one of six hospitals in Edmonton, Alberta during a 2-year period in 2001–2003. The incidence was 1.1 per 1000 deliveries. A comparison group included 333 nonpregnant women 20 to 40 years of age who had pneumonia (incidence, 1.3 per 1000). The commonest symptoms of pneumonia in pregnant women were cough, fever, and shortness of breath. None of those affected had received influenza vaccine. Cough, fever, and sputum production dominated in nonpregnant women. Co-morbid conditions were conspicuously absent in the pregnant women. In contrast, the nonpregnant group included women with chronic obstructive lung disease, diabetes, heart disease, liver disease, cancer, and HIV infection. The gestational age when pneumonia developed averaged 29 weeks; more than half the patients were in the third trimester. In no pregnant woman was multilobar involvement observed, but four pregnant women had pleural effusion. Levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, and albumin all were lower in pregnant women. All of the pregnant women had relatively low scores for severity of illness using the PORT (Pneumonia Patient Outcome Research Team) system. More than 95% of the comparison group also had low-risk PORT scores. Apart from an abortion at 10 weeks’ gestation there were no fetal deaths. Live-born infants had a mean birth weight of 3320 gm and a mean 1-minute Apgar score of 8.6. None of the newborn infants had evident anomalies. The only woman who died was not pregnant. The 28 pregnant women received many different antibiotics, most commonly cefuroxime, azithromycin, and erythromycin. Pregnant women were twice as likely to be admitted to hospital than nonpregnant women in the same age group, but they had a shorter length of stay. These findings suggest that pregnant women tolerate pneumonia well and are unlikely to develop pulmonary or immunological complications. Pregnancy itself does not increase the risk of pneumonia. Neither the clinical findings nor the outcomes differ from those in nonpregnant women with pneumonia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207