Asymmetric synthesis based on chiral (arene)tricarbonylchromium acetal complexes. Addition reactions to the <i>ortho</i>-formyl complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The addition reactions of organolithium and Grignard reagents to chiral, enantiomerically pure ortho-formyl (arene)tricarbonylchromium acetal complex (2) have been studied. The diastereoselectivity of the addition process is fair in the absence of an additional Lewis acid, and good in the presence of Ti(OiPr)4. The nature of the newly formed chiral centre, and studies on the possible nature of the nucleophilic species suggest that the Lewis acid acts through monodentate coordination to the aldehyde carbonyl, and thereby alters the carbonyl rotamer population more heavily in favour of the s-trans conformation. Nucleophilic attack then occurs on the face anti- to that bearing the Cr(CO)3 unit.Key words: (arene)tricarbonylchromium complexes, asymmetric synthesis, carbonyl additions, Lewis acids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".