MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991447074 · doi:10.1107/s160053680100085x

Doxylamine hydrogen succinate

2001· article· en· W1991447074 on OpenAlexaff
Masood Parvez, S.A. Dalrymple, Adrien P. Côté

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports Online · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystal structures of chemical compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmine gas treatingChemistryHydrogen bondAmmoniumProtonationCrystal structureHydrogenAlkoxy groupMedicinal chemistryStereochemistryCrystallographyIonOrganic chemistryMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crystal structure of doxyl­amine hydrogen succinate or di­methyl{[1-phenyl-1-(2-pyridyl)­ethoxy]­ethyl]­ammonium hydrogen succinate, C17H23N2O+·C4H5O4−, contains two independent protonated mol­ecules of doxyl­amine with different conformations and two succinate anions in an asymmetric unit. The structure is stabilized by hydrogen bonds involving the cations and the anions, with O⋯O and N⋯O distances in the range 2.536 (5)–2.853 (5) Å.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports OnlineSame topicCrystal structures of chemical compoundsFrench-language works237,207