MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991459072 · doi:10.1159/000170203

Immunobiology of Chronic Renal Transplant Rejection

2008· review· en· W1991459072 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Purification · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersUniversity of TorontoKidney Foundation of CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsChronic renal failureMedicineInflammationPathophysiologyImmunologyImmune systemTransplantationRenal transplantIntensive care medicinePathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With improvements in short-term renal transplant survival, concerns regarding the long-term outcome are becoming more important. Chronic rejection is the single most important cause of graft failure in the first posttransplant decade, but its pathophysiology remains poorly understood. It has been suggested that chronic rejection is the tissue remodelling that is initiated by smoldering foci of inflammation initiated by acute rejection episodes, perhaps in conjunction with chronic rejection-specific allogeneic immune reaction. The chronicity of these processes leads to concurrent activation of tissue repair mechanisms and changes in renal hemodynamics, which contribute to the tissue remodelling that is characteristic for chronic rejection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it