MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991466172 · doi:10.1159/000212473

Age-Related Changes in Transfer RNAs and Synthetases in Germinating Soybean (Glycine max) Cotyledons

2009· article· en· W1991466172 on OpenAlexaff
D.T.N. Pillay, Siddarame Gowda

Bibliographic record

VenueGerontology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValineGlycineIsoleucineAmino acidTransfer RNALeucineBiochemistryBiologyAmino Acyl-tRNA SynthetasesSerineAspartic acidMethionineRNAEnzymeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transfer RNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases were isolated from 5- and 20-day-old etiolated ageing soybean cotyledons. The relative concentrations of Mg2+ and ATP for optimal acylation (using homologous tRNAs and synthetases) for the 16 amino acids tested indicate that the amino acids can be grouped into 3 categories with a Mg:ATP ratio of 2:1, 5:1 and 10:1 (aspartic acid, isoleucine, leucine, serine, and valine). The total amino acid acceptance for 5-day-old cotyledons was 0.427 mumol tRNA and 0.349 mumol/mumol tRNA for 20-day-old cotyledons. This shows that as cotyledons age, tRNA preparations show an overall decrease of 16.6% amino acid acceptance ability compared to tRNA from younger cotyledons. Charged tRNA samples from 5- and 20-day cotyledons chromatographed on RPC-5 columns demonstrate pronounced qualitative and quantitative changes in tRNA species as cotyledons age, including displacements of peaks as in alanyl-tRNAs and glycyl-tRNAs; disappearance of some species as in valyl-tRNAs, glutamyl-tRNAs, leucyl-tRNAs, lysyl-tRNAs, arginyl-tRNAs, histidyl-tRNAs and tyrosyl-tRNAs and formation of new species as in phenylalanine-tRNA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGerontologySame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207