Clinical Features of Lupus Cystitis Complicated with Hydroureteronephrosis in a Chinese Population: Table 1.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Lupus cystitis is a relatively rare complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The clinical characterization of it remains obscure. We sought to provide insight for timely recognition and diagnosis of lupus cystitis, and for efficacious management of this disease entity. METHODS: The clinical files of 18 patients with lupus cystitis treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were reviewed. Clinical manifestations, laboratory investigations, therapeutic measurements, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: There were both male and female patients with a wide range of ages. The interval from onset of SLE to hydroureteronephrosis varied from 0 to 5 years. The most common clinical presentations were gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, while urinary symptoms were less common and relatively mild. Lupus nephritis often presented concomitantly with lupus cystitis but was relatively less active pathologically. Laboratory findings showed a high rate of positive anti-SSA. Therapy of prednisone plus cyclophosphamide was effective for lupus cystitis. Delayed diagnosis and treatment may lead to irreversible obstructive uropathy and permanent loss of renal function. CONCLUSION: Lupus cystitis may not be so rare as has been thought. The diagnosis of lupus cystitis should be considered when patients with SLE present with GI symptoms, and therapy should begin as early as possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".