MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991494716 · doi:10.1097/shk.0b013e31804f77b8

SYSTEMIC AND REGIONAL HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF HIGH-DOSE EPINEPHRINE INFUSION IN HYPOXIC PIGLETS RESUSCITATED WITH 100% OXYGEN

2007· article· en· W1991494716 on OpenAlexaff
Po‐Yin Cheung, Sameh Abozaid, Zakariya Al‐Salam, Scott T. Johnson, Yingqian Li, David L. Bigam

Bibliographic record

VenueShock · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpinephrineMedicineAnesthesiaHypoxia (environmental)Vascular resistanceHemodynamicsCardiac outputCatecholaminePerfusionBlood pressurePulmonary arteryInternal medicineOxygenChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shock and poor regional perfusion are common in asphyxiated neonates. We compared the systemic and regional hemodynamic effects of high-dose epinephrine (E) with those of dopamine combined with low-dose epinephrine (DE) infusions in a neonatal model of hypoxia-reoxygenation. Neonatal piglets (1-3 days, 1.5-2.5 kg) were acutely instrumented to continuously monitor systemic arterial pressure (SAP), pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac index (CI), and blood flows at the left common carotid, superior mesenteric, and renal arteries. Either epinephrine (1 microg.kg(-1).min(-1)) or dopamine (10 microg.kg(-1).min(-1)) and epinephrine (0.2 microg.kg(-1).min(-1)) were given for 2 h in hypoxic piglets resuscitated with 100% oxygen (n = 8 per group) in a randomized blinded fashion. Control piglets received hypoxia and reoxygenation but no catecholamine infusion (n = 7). Alveolar hypoxia (PaO2, 33-37 mmHg) caused reduced CI (89-92 vs. 171-186 mL.kg(-1).min(-1) of baseline, P < 0.05), hypotension (SAP, 28-32 mmHg) with pH 7.05 to 7.10, and decreased regional flows. Upon reoxygenation, CI and SAP improved but gradually deteriorated to 131 to 136 mL.kg(-1).min(-1) and 41 to 49 mmHg at 2 h of reoxygenation, respectively. E and DE administration similarly improved CI (167 +/- 60 and 166 +/- 55 vs. 121 +/- 35 mL.kg(-1).min(-1) of controls) and SAP (53 +/- 7 and 56 +/- 10 vs. 39 +/- 8 mmHg of controls), respectively, and the pulmonary vascular resistance (vs. controls, all P < 0.05). Heart rate and pulmonary artery pressure were not different between groups. Systemic oxygen delivery and consumption were increased in E- and DE-treated groups with no difference in extraction ratio between groups. There were no differences in regional blood flows and oxygen delivery between groups. After hyperlactatemia with hypoxia, plasma lactate levels decreased with no difference between groups. Epinephrine given as the sole agent is as effective as dopamine and low-dose epinephrine combined in treating shock and hypotension that follow the resuscitation of hypoxic neonatal piglets, with no reduction in regional perfusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueShockSame topicCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207