MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991518800 · doi:10.1086/309507

<i>EUVE</i>Observations of Hercules X‐1 during a Short High‐State Turn‐on

2000· article· en· W1991518800 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtreme ultraviolet lithographyExtreme ultravioletAccretion (finance)RADIUSBlack-body radiationNeutron starBremsstrahlung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Observations of Hercules X-1 by the Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer ( EUVE ) covering low state and the early part of the short high state are reported here. This is the first EUV observation of this part of the 35 day cycle of Her X-1. The low-state portion of the EUV light curve (prior to the start of the short high state) has similar properties as that following the end of the short high state . This is evidence that the low-state EUV emission is primarily due to EUV reflection from the companion star HZ Her. The EUV light curve during the short high state is pulsed and closely resembles the average 2-12 keV X-ray short high-state light curve, indicating that the EUV emission, like the X-ray emission, originates near the neutron star. The short high-state EUV spectrum is consistent with a blackbody of temperature ≃0.13 keV and radius ≃230 km. The short high-state EUV spectrum and pulse shape are similar to that in the soft X-rays (0.1-1 keV). The most likely origin of the EUV emission is reprocessed X-rays from the inner edge of the accretion disk, and the radius of the inner edge of the accretion disk is likely to be small, consistent with that determined from analysis of the X-ray pulse shape evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207