MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991539441 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2015.7326758

Road damage detection from VHR remote sensing images based on multiscale texture analysis and dempster shafer theory

2015· article· en· W1991539441 on OpenAlexaff
Moslem Ouled Sghaier, Richard Lepage

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDempster–Shafer theoryComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceTexture (cosmology)Remote sensingImage texturePattern recognition (psychology)Image segmentationImage (mathematics)Geology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infrastructures damage detection in case of major disasters is one of the most discussed problems and represent an active field of research in remotely sensed imaging. In this paper, a novel method designed for fast roads damage extraction is proposed since these structures are important in the delivery of assistance and to manage the intervention of the emergency teams on ground. The proposed methodology includes first an already completed step that consists in extracting the road network from both the pre- and post-disaster images. Then, a multiscale segmentation based on the wavelet transform is performed on the road surface and the obtained objects from the two coregistered images are compared. Finally, the Dempster Shafer theory is applied to decide the membership class of each object in a first step, and then identify the nature of changes using the multidimensional evidential reasoning. Images acquired by the Geo-Eye satellite before and after the earthquake that hits Port-au-Prince (Haiti) on January 2010 are used in the experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image Fusion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207