MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991551840 · doi:10.1109/mcom.2013.6525604

Trace analysis and mining for smart cities: issues, methods, and applications

2013· article· en· W1991551840 on OpenAlexaff
Gang Pan, Guande Qi, Wangsheng Zhang, Shijian Li, Zhaohui Wu, Laurence T. Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Magazine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsTRACE (psycholinguistics)Computer scienceData scienceSmart citySemantics (computer science)State (computer science)Computer securityInternet of Things

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traces of moving objects in a city, which depict lots of semantics concerning human mobility and city dynamics, are becoming increasingly important. In this article, we first give a brief introduction to trace data; then we present six research issues in trace analysis and mining, and survey the state-of-the-art methods; finally, five promising application domains in smart cities are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.015
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.009
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations207
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications MagazineSame topicHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisFrench-language works237,207