MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991594498 · doi:10.4161/cc.25746

The role of cyclin D1 in response to long-term exposure to ionizing radiation

2013· review· en· W1991594498 on OpenAlexaff
Tsutomu Shimura, Manabu Fukumoto, Naoki Kunugita

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEffects of Radiation Exposure
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonizing radiationBiologyCyclin D1Cancer researchCell biologyTerm (time)Radiation exposureGeneticsCell cycleCancerIrradiation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The health-related hazards resulting from long-term exposure to radiation remain unknown. Thus, an appropriate molecular marker is needed to clarify these effects. Cyclin D1 regulates the cell cycle transition from the G 1 phase to the S phase. Cyclin D1 is degraded as a G1/S checkpoint after 10 Gy of single acute radiation exposure, whereas conversely, cyclin D1 is stabilized when human tumor cells are exposed to fractionated radiation (FR) with 0.5 Gy of x-rays for 31 d. In this article, we review new findings regarding cyclin D1 overexpression in response to long-term exposure to FR. Cyclin D1 overexpression is associated with induction of genomic instability in irradiated cells. Therefore, repression of cyclin D1 expression is likely to cancel the harmful effects of long-term exposure to FR. Thus cyclin D1 may be a marker of long-term exposure to radiation and is a putative molecular radioprotection target for radiation safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicEffects of Radiation ExposureFrench-language works237,207