Thermal Stability and DPPC/Ca<sup>2+</sup> Interactions of Pulmonary Surfactant SP-A from Bulk-Phase and Monolayer IR Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Surfactant protein A (SP-A), the most abundant pulmonary surfactant protein, is implicated in multiple biological functions including surfactant homeostasis, biophysical activity, and host defense. SP-A forms ternary complexes with lipids and Ca2+ which are important for protein function. The current study uses infrared (IR) transmission spectroscopy to investigate the bulk-phase interaction between SP-A, 1,2-dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), and Ca2+ ions along with IR reflection-absorption spectroscopy (IRRAS) to examine protein secondary structure and lipid orientational order in monolayer films in situ at the air/water interface. The amide I contour of SP-A reveals two features at 1653 and 1636 cm(-1) arising from the collagen-like domain and a broad feature at 1645 cm(-1) suggested to arise from the carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD). SP-A secondary structure is unchanged in lipid monolayers. Thermal denaturation of SP-A in the presence of either DPPC or Ca2+ ion reveals a sequence of events involving the initial melting of the collagen-like region, followed by formation of intermolecular extended forms. Interestingly, these spectral changes were inhibited in the ternary system, showing that the combined presence of both DPPC and Ca2+ confers a remarkable thermal stability upon SP-A. The ternary interaction was revealed by the enhanced intensity of the asymmetric carboxylate stretching vibration. The IRRAS measurements indicated that incorporation of SP-A into preformed DPPC monolayers at a surface pressure of 10 mN/m induced a decrease in the average acyl chain tilt angle from 35 degrees to 28 degrees. In contrast, little change in chain tilt was observed at surface pressures of 25 or 40 mN/m. These results are consistent with and extend the fluorescence microscopy studies of Keough and co-workers [Ruano, M. L. F., et al. (1998) Biophys. J. 74, 1101-1109] in which SP-A was suggested to accumulate at the liquid-expanded/liquid-condensed boundary. Overall these experiments reveal the remarkable stability of SP-A in diverse, biologically relevant environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".