Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A microdébrider was selected to accomplish partial inferior turbinectomy, allowing for controlled and rapid removal of hypertrophic soft tissue while preserving the general turbinate form. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical outcome, healing, and any adverse consequences from the microdébrider partial turbinectomy procedure. SETTING: A public hospital in north-central Israel. DESIGN: A nonrandomized prospective study of 35 adults who were referred for nasal airway surgery, including turbinectomy. METHODS: All patients underwent bilateral inferior turbinate reduction with the microdébrider, with removal of mucosa from the medial and inferior portions of the inferior turbinates. Detailed follow-up was accomplished at 4 or more months postoperatively, including a visual analogue scale questionnaire and videoendoscopy. For seven patients, pre- and postoperative mucosal biopsies were available to evaluate healing and epithelial regeneration. RESULTS: Nasal endoscopy showed well-healed turbinate membranes and preservation of the turbinate form, with widening of the inferomedial nasal airway space. Subjective nasal patency improved after surgery, p < .01, and the subjective sense of smell was improved, p < .01, without associated crusting, pain, irritation, sneezing, or dryness. Postoperative biopsies showed subepithelial fibrosis and regenerated epithelium, generally of respiratory differentiation. CONCLUSION: Inferior turbinate reduction can be accomplished efficiently with the microdébrider device, without undue side effects. SIGNIFICANCE: Further experience and long-term follow-up with this technique are warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".