MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991635730 · doi:10.4039/ent132607-5

TROPHIC INTERACTION BETWEEN <i>SITODIPLOSIS MOSELLANA</i> (DIPTERA: CECIDOMYIIDAE) AND SPRING WHEAT: IMPLICATIONS FOR YIELD AND SEED QUALITY

2000· article· en· W1991635730 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Entomologist · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaCanadian Seed Growers' Association
KeywordsBiologyMidgeBiomass (ecology)AgronomyGerminationCecidomyiidaeLarvaPoaceaeHorticultureBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Larvae of the wheat midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin), feed on developing seeds of common and durum wheats, Triticum aestivum L. and Triticum durum L. (Graminae). The trophic relationships between insect and plant were quantified as biomass gains or losses using plants infested artificially in the laboratory and naturally in plots and commercial fields. The biomass of seeds from different parts of a wheat spike varied, but seeds in all parts of a spike were infested, independently of their potential biomass. Most infested seeds had 1–3 larvae, but at least 11 larvae could mature on a single seed without reducing larval biomass. When larvae finished feeding and seeds attained about one third of their biomass, specific impact varied from 4.1 to 8.5 mg of seed biomass lost for each milligram of biomass gained by a larva, with the impact declining as the number of larvae per seed increased. Specific impact rose to 100 mg/mg as seeds of T . aestivum and a primitive wheat, Triticum monococcum L., matured, and higher still for T . durum . Wheat plants did not compensate for wheat midge damage, and no indirect damage to uninfested seeds was detected. The distribution of biomass for infested seeds was bimodal, with over 40% less than 8 mg when hand harvested, whereas infested seeds harvested mechanically had a unimodal distribution, with nearly all of the most severely damaged seeds removed during harvest. A visual rating system of six damage categories was related to the biomass of the seeds. The germination and early growth rate of infested seeds were reduced compared with those of uninfested seeds. Based on the biomass relationships for the insect–plant interaction and the visual rating of damage, high-protein number 1 grade common and durum wheat and number 1 grade durum wheat can tolerate up to 6% of the seeds being infested by larvae, before downgrading is likely. For other grades, the economic threshold is 10% of the seeds infested, based on yield loss. Seed growers can adopt the threshold for number 1 wheat (6% infestation) to prevent downgrading, which would also reduce the effects of infestation on seed germination to an acceptable level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it