MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991638420 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2014.7036809

Opportunistic WiFi offloading in vehicular environment: A queueing analysis

2014· article· en· W1991638420 on OpenAlexaff
Nan Cheng, Ning Lu, Ning Zhang, Xuemin Shen, J.W. Mark

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGreen IT and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceUploadComputer networkQueueing theoryVehicular ad hoc networkCellular networkService (business)The InternetServerWireless ad hoc networkWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present an analytical framework for offloading cellular traffic by outdoor WiFi network in the vehicular environment. Specifically, we consider a generic vehicular user with Poisson data service arrivals to download/upload data from/to the Internet through the cost-effective WiFi network (want-to) or the cellular network providing full service coverage (have-to). Under this scenario, the WiFi offloading performance, characterized by offloading effectiveness, is analyzed in terms of desired average service delay which is the average time the data services can be deferred for WiFi availability. We establish an explicit relation between offloading effectiveness and average service delay by an M/G/l/K queueing model, and the tradeoff between the two is examined. We validate our analytical framework through simulations based on a VANET simulation tool VANETMobisim and real map data sets. Our analytical framework should be valuable for providing offloading guidelines to both vehicular users and network operators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGreen IT and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207