Selective upregulation of a functional β<sub>7</sub> integrin on differentiating eosinophils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The sequence of adhesion-molecule expression during eosinophil differentiation remains unclear. METHODS: We analyzed the surface expression of alpha4, beta1, and beta7 integrins and compared it to established myeloid developmental markers, using the eosinophilic cell line HL-60 clone 15, as well as cord and peripheral blood differentiation assays. RESULTS: Cells induced to eosinophil differentiation by treatment with butyric acid, IL-5, and GM-CSF showed a significant upregulation of beta7 integrin expression coincident with a marked upregulation of CD35 and attenuation of CD33 and beta1 integrin expression. In addition, adhesion of induced HL-60 clone 15 cells to fibronectin was attenuated by a beta7 integrin antibody. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that protein synthesis-dependent upregulation of the functional beta7 integrin occurs under conditions when beta4 and beta1 integrins are fully expressed, indicating a sequential appearance of specific adhesion molecules on differentiating eosinophil progenitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".