Controlled Synthesis of Tungsten and Tungsten Oxide Nanorod Films
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tungsten and tungsten oxide films were deposited in a hot filament reactor under flowing argon atmosphere at various filament temperatures, followed by the characterization via scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and x-ray diffraction (XRD). It revealed that both tungsten (W) and tungsten oxide [WO2+x (0≤x<1)] nanorods with diameters in the range of 4-200 nm and lengths up to a few microns can be synthesized. After deposition at higher temperatures (above 2200 °C), the predominant phase in the film was tungsten, while with the filament temperature decreasing, the content of WO2+x increased significantly. It implies that the method applied in the present study enables the synthesis of high purity tungsten or tungsten oxide nanorods possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it