MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991668600 · doi:10.1109/acc.2012.6315609

PWATOOLS: A MATLAB toolbox for piecewise-affine controller synthesis

2012· article· en· W1991668600 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohsen Zamani Fekri, Behzad Samadi, Luís Rodrigues

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsToolboxComputer scienceMATLABNonlinear systemController (irrigation)Control engineeringFlutterSoftwareLyapunov functionControl theory (sociology)Control (management)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringProgramming languageAerodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A toolbox for piecewise-affine (PWA) systems called PWATOOLS is introduced in this paper. Numerical control synthesis methodologies for PWA and nonlinear systems have been implemented in this toolbox. Although several Lyapunov-based PWA control synthesis approaches exist in the literature, to the best of our knowledge there is no software toolbox that implements these methods for continuous-time PWA systems that is also capable of analyzing nonlinear systems and synthesizing PWA controllers for them. PWATOOLS is proposed to fill this gap as a software toolbox with the ability to analyze and synthesize PWA controllers for nonlinear systems. The toolbox proposed in this paper has been written to serve as an educational as well as a modeling, analysis and synthesis tool. PWATOOLS uses Yalmip, SeDuMi and PENBMI to find solutions for the sufficient conditions for stability analysis of the models or the synthesis of PWA controllers. An example in active flutter supression illustrates the use of this new toolbox.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207